2024 Agenda

Flip through our conference brochure and discover what’s new this year.
Download Brochure
Day 1
September 25, 2024
FIRESIDE CHAT
Enforcement and Coordination with Treasury’s Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI): Key Takeaways and Updates for Industry

Paul AhernChief Counselor for Enforcement, Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI)U.S. Department of Treasury

John SondermanDirector, Office of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and SecurityU.S. Department of Commerce
BIS Part 732 “Know Your Customer” Guidance, Supply Chain-Screening and Red Flags: The Advanced Essentials of Vetting Third Parties, End-Users and End-Uses

Lori RomeroDirector, Trade CounselL3 Harris Technologies

Aaron TambriniSpecial Agent in Charge of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and SecurityU.S. Department of Commerce
- Red flags: Abnormal circumstances in a transaction that indicate that the export may be destined for an inappropriate end-use, end-user, or destination
- Obtaining documentary evidence concerning the transaction, both in the licensing process and in all export control documents
- Instructing the salesforce: Mandating they receive an affirmation from the intermediary around the definition of the actual end-use, end-user and ultimate country of destination for the product your firm is seeking to sell
- Establishing clear policies and effective compliance procedures to ensure red flag knowledge about transactions can be evaluated by responsible senior officials
- Reevaluating all the information after the Red Flag inquiry to ensure legitimacy
- BIS efforts to work in partnership with industry to make this Red Flag front line of defense effective, while minimizing the regulatory burden
Networking Break
ANTI-BOYCOTT COMPLIANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT (HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND AUDIENCE POLLING)
Anti-Boycott and 15 CFR Part 760 of the EAR: Clarifying The Six Prohibitions, Required Reports and Compliance Expectations

Susan BridgmanGeneral Counsel and Chief Compliance OfficerField Aerospace

Heather SrokaSenior Trade CounselIntel
Part 760 of the EAR, “Restrictive Trade Practices or Boycotts,” has seen increased compliance and enforcement attention over the past 12 months. The increasingly fractured geopolitical environment has led to other international trade embargoes becoming subject to U.S. antiboycott rules. In March 2024, for the first time, BIS’s Office of Antiboycott Compliance released a public list of companies who have been identifies as having made reportable boycott requests. New enforcement actions have seen companies pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties due to Part 760 compliance failures. How are multinationals keeping up with this growing list of embargoes and what are the best practices around creating anti-boycott programs to remain compliant?
- Training employees: Provide training to all levels of employees about antiboycott compliance, including senior sales and supply chain, customer service, shipping, and receiving personnel
- Screening sales: Reviewing all sales for antiboycott related requests, including purchase orders, contracts, request for quotations, and other discussions or terms/conditions being agreed to as part of the sale
- Develop an escalation process for reporting any such requests or questions internally
- Report requests: Form BIS 621-P for single transactions or BIS 6051P for multiple transactions involving boycott requests received in the same calendar quarter
Networking Luncheon
CASE STUDIES HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND AUDIENCE POLLING
EAR 734.99 (b) and Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR) and 734.4/de minimis Thresholds: How to Apply Complex Requirements in Practice and Avoid the Key Compliance Traps

Jana del-CerroPartnerCrowell & Moring LLP

Christy AresteSenior Manager, Global Trade Compliance & Anti-CorruptionW. W. Grainger
What are the emerging barriers to getting your team up to speed on evolving China export compliance decision-making? What are the mission-critical points to address when upskilling your team around the needs for continuous updating control programs? Using hypothetical scenarios and audience feedback, this session will leave you with the management tools needed to fulfill compliance needs while at the same time increasing your team’s understanding of the compliance landscape.
FDPR:
- Avoiding key pitfalls when applying the FDPR
- Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR)/advanced computing export controls rules
- de minimis threshold decision-making
- Controlled Content: U.S. origin items that require BIS authorization (a license or license exception)
- Examine necessary tools your peers are using for when your compliance teams are stumped by:
- Impacts of the FDPR rule: How do you tighten up compliance oversight around third-party due diligence procedures?
- Conducting gap analysis: Updating your compliance program protocols to make sure legal, engineering, and trade compliance are all in the loop
- Employee training and monitoring
- Has the company provided tailored training for high-risk and control employees?
- What resources have been available to employees to provide guidance
- Conducting gap analysis: Updating compliance programs to make sure legal, engineering, and trade compliance are all in the loop with new controls
- Third-party management
- Developing a model that stratifies your risk based on third parties — and how to perform due diligence accordingly
- What to do with information uncovered during the vetting process: How to evaluate red flags
RUSSIA STRATEGY SESSION #1 (HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND AUDIENCE POLLING)
The Next Phase 734.9 (f) Russia Sanctions and Export Controls Compliance: Positioning Your Program, People and Training to Tackle the Knowns (and Unknowns) of What’s Ahead

Lexia B. KrownVice President, Global Trade ComplianceESAB

Todd WillisGlobal Trade AdvisorCaterpillar Inc.

Waqas ShahidVice President, Forensic ServicesCharles River Associates (CRA)

Jason SilvermanPartnerDentons
Practical tools for understanding of Russia Export Controls Compliance Landscape: EAR 734.9(f)
- Audience polling: Identifying your critical compliance impacts and adjusting best practices for export controls-related training
- More tools to help your team digest:
- Russia/Belarus EAR 734.9(f)
- EAR supplements and restrictions on exports “for use in” Russia
- Availability of exemptions and licenses for encryption activities in Russia
Practical Tools for Understanding the Russia Sanctions Compliance Landscape: Russia Harmful Foreign Activities Regulations (“RuHSR”)
- Audience polling: Identifying your critical compliance impacts and adjusting best practices for sanctions-related training
- OFAC developments and General Licenses: Scope and limitations
- Russian countermeasures on withdrawing companies and expropriation decrees
- Alignment with US sanctions and export controls and areas of difference
Networking Break
CASE STUDIES HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND AUDIENCE POLLING
EAR Licensing, Jurisdiction and Classification Challenges: 764.5(f), 600-Series Classification, CCATS and the Lesser-Known Interplay of the ITAR

Maria AssusaDirector, Export ComplianceHoneywell

Marcos CzackiGeneral Global Counsel & Compliance OfficerNavistar México
During this advanced, in-depth, practical session, the expert speakers will take you through the evolving, complex web of EAR restrictions, their real-life application and common misunderstandings that have caught the attention of U.S. enforcement agencies. Benefit from an opportunity to hear hypothetical examples that will help to clarify the impact of the rules on both U.S. and foreign operations.
Licensing/Authorization
- Transactions involving sensitive technology, sensitive countries or parties, or situations of first impression where higher government scrutiny will take place
- Licensing strategies that incorporate provisos and working with the government to reconsider proviso by deletion or modification
- Storing and managing technical data within companies that operate across borders
- Using STA and other complex EAR Exceptions
Jurisdiction/Classification
- Jurisdiction and classification considerations for highly complex or novel situations
- Applying useful sources to perform jurisdictional and classification analysis
- Inside the commodity jurisdiction process (CJ, CCATS and Company internal) and advanced considerations
- Complex issues in 600-series classification
Advanced Compliance/Enforcement Issues
- Key lessons learned from the latest consent agreements and enforcement policies to build best-in-class compliance programs
- Critical issues to consider when evaluating potential violations
- Handling voluntary disclosures and internal investigations – if and when to disclose
- Responding to directed disclosure and government requests for information
- Compliance with Part 764.5(f) regarding treatment of unlawfully exported items after voluntary disclosure.
Close of Day One
Day 2
September 26, 2024
RUSSIA STRATEGY SESSION # 2 (HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS AND AUDIENCE POLLING)
Part 1- Supplier Circumvention and Your Screening Program: Monitoring Third-Party Intermediaries to Mitigate the Risk of Export and Sanctions Violations

Kathy CanaanGlobal Director, Trade ComplianceFluor Corporation

Matthew FogartySenior Counsel, TradeGeneral Motors

Amanda MarshallSenior AnalystSayari
In the light of recent export controls and trade restrictions on Russia and Belarus, and changes to historical transhipment routes, such as the shift from traditional transshipment hubs in the EU to third countries with less strict export regulations and enforcement, the risk of product diversion/circumvention has become exacerbated considerably. What can multinationals do to improve the maintenance of risk-based compliance programs in order to better identify the red flags that a third party intermediary maybe using to evade evolving export controls and sanctions?
- Conducting thorough due diligence on partners and suppliers
- Monitoring and auditing their transactions and supply chains
- Ctaying updated on sanctions lists and regulatory changes
- When to seek outside counsel
Networking Break
CHINA THINK TANK #2: ADVANCED SCENARIOS (HYPOTHETICALS AND AUDIENCE POLLING)
MEU Part 744 and MIEU 1753 (a) (2): The 2 Biggest Grey Areas and How to Address Them

Alexandra LandisSenior Counsel, Director of Compliance and Export ControlsPalladyne AI Corp

Michael L. BurtonPartnerJacobson Burton Kelley PLLC
- The grey areas across the different scopes and sources of prohibitions regarding each set of Chinese trade control policies
- How industry is updating screening, compliance policies and procedures around MEU, MIEU regulations: What are best practices?
- License applications, approvals, and denials: What are the lessons learned from ever-evolving trends?
GENERATIVE AI AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Managing the Intersection of Cloud Computing, AI Regulation and EAR Compliance: What the AI EO and Recent EAR Changes Mean for Your Program in Practice

Joe SchoorlExport Compliance CounselGoogle

Janet K. KimPartnerBaker McKenzie LLP
The rapid pace of AI development has created novel questions for governments and export control practitioners. We are in the early stages of what could represent a major shift in how export controls operate, and it is worth taking time to consider what steps have already been taken and what may be considered in the future.
- Overview of generative AI
- How existing export controls apply to AI
- The AI EO: Clarifying key terms and requirements, including cloud ”Infrastructure as a Service” provisions
- Ongoing debates and open questions
CORPORATE CASE STUDY
Using Data Analytics and Metrics to Enhance Your Compliance Program: Deemed Exports, Classification, Licensing and More

Grant HoseaDirector, Global Trade ComplianceAlbemarle
- KPIs to measure broker effectiveness: On time document submission, post entry audits, weighting average compliance efforts to specific data elements
- Ways to keep up to date with product classifications: Using open PO reports to prioritize, focus on unclassified material, and to review previous classifications
- Management of potential deemed exports: Employee/manager locations, SOW, license reviews and what to do if there is a change in the SOW
- Metrics for denied party screening to help detect screening errors and other due diligence pitfalls
- Utilize screening data to see release times and minimize false positives
Networking Luncheon
CASE STUDIES: 734.20/734.18 (HYPOTHETICALS AND AUDIENCE POLLING)
Deemed Exports, Cloud Computing and End-Use Controls: Deemed Exports and How to Apply EAR Part 734.20/734.18 Requirements and Exceptions and Navigate the Nuances

Michelle AragonSenior Manager Trade ComplianceLeonardo DRS

Bryce BittnerManaging Counsel, International TradeMcKinsey & Company

Jeffrey RichardsonPrincipalMiller Canfield
The definition of “export” in the EAR includes the concept of releasing technical data or technology to a foreign person in the U.S. as part of the definition of a “deemed export”, or the transfer of ownership or control of a technology to a foreign person. Interesting changes are proposed – EAR §734.18 and 734.20 – which would deal with transfers of technology and use of encryption. What’s behind these rules, what are the limitations, and how is industry is managing these exceptions?
Networking Break
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL EAR/SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE THINK TANK
How Exporters are Dovetailing Multi-Jurisdictional Export Requirements for Effective Global Trade Compliance Program Customization

Eric J. LarsenTrade Compliance ManagerBoeing

Jeff SammonSenior Director, Global TradeTE Connectivity
During this session, benefit from advanced-level case studies and cross-industry perspectives on current and anticipated export control enforcement in the U.S., EU and UK. Understand the current global export control landscape and assess common misunderstandings around how to customize your compliance program for different global jurisdictions through peer-to-peer, cross-industry benchmarking exercises.
- Best-practices on how to upskill your team and update your global export compliance program considering the multitude of recent export controls developments
- Identify the tools that your team can use to best identify significant non-multilateral compliance risks
- The how-to’s behind to identifying how U.S. export control reform and developments overlap/impact with UK and EU regulatory frameworks and how this intersection might derail compliance protocol updates
- Tools for monitoring and investigations
- Does the monitoring and investigation step fall into the compliance function, or audit/IT, or a combination
ADVANCED CYBER FOCUS: EAR CATEGORY 5 PART 2
Navigating the Finer Points of Category 5, Part Two, the Final Cyber Rule

Katelyn HilfertySenior AssociateMorgan Lewis & Bockius LLP

Heather SrokaSenior Trade CounselIntel
The “cyber rule” and debated export controls on intrusion software have balanced U.S. foreign policy and national security concerns with the need for maintaining a regulatory framework that allows for legitimate cybersecurity transactions. How should industry be applying this complex rule? What questions should they be asking and what steps should be taken to ensure compliance?